Pages

Monday, September 10, 2007

ATTENTION DEM'S; BOYCOTT DIBELLA'S FUND-RAISER FOR CONSERVATIVE D.A. CANDIDATE



Attention Dem's Anne Marie DiBella is hosting a Fund-Raiser for the Conservative candidate for D.A. on Thursday, September 27th. Mrs. DiBella is a Kingston Democratic Committee woman and is working against the Democratic candidate that our committee proudly supported, Jonathan Sennett.


I urge people to call Anne Maire DiBella and tell her to step down as a committee woman if she is going to host a fund-raiser for a non Democrat.


Call Anne Marie at:

Home-331-7570

30 comments:

  1. Anonymous7:12 AM

    Jeremy there's a good study out by NYU,a guy by the name of Amodio.It uses brain imaging technology to illustrate the mental handicap of the conservative mind,you should try to put a link on your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:37 AM

    You shouldn't make people's phone numbers and email addresses available on your blog without their permission. You are a dirtbag

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous12:19 PM

    To 712

    Really...... Could you share that with us??

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1137 : I only gave information that you can find on the city's website.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous7:26 PM

    Chicago Tribune had a story on it,worth reading.Something like "it's all in our heads"

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous7:37 PM

    Political Attitudes May Be All In Head,Judy Perez,Chicago Sept.10

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous10:11 PM

    Dibella has guts, good for her. Sennett simply has no support.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous10:17 PM

    Sennett has no support...haha You're clearly out of the loop. DiBella doesn't have guts, more like a hairy set of balls

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous11:56 PM

    to 712... sned me a link and I'll post it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous7:04 AM

    Jeremy when you see the address you'll understand why I couldn't handle the link,someone of your interests should definitely google it to read at least.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous3:51 PM

    Not sure how Neurocognitive styles of AMBIGUITY and NOVELTY which relates to liberals is better than the structured and persistent handling shown by conservatives. If that means conservatives know that 2+2=4 (persistent AND structured) and liberals think 2+2=4 or 5 or 6 (Ambiguity and definately NOVEL), then yes, one is definately more advanced. Just like the cavement, liberals can't add either.

    We can handle liberals as handicapped, and we should HELP them feel good about themselves. We should be more accepting of their handicapped ways, understanding and caring. Just as we would treat other handicaps. They cannot help being this way. They were born this way.

    ReplyDelete
  12. When I get back, I'll post something on the report..thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous11:00 PM

    3:51 PM - Unfortunately, it's a tautological argument, but your post clearly shows why conservative rigidity and persistence is a flaw and Liberal ambiguity and novelty is an asset.

    The mere fact that you don't understand the concept proves it. What a shame you'll never reach a cognitive level where you will realize it.

    But if you did realize it, then you'd be a Liberal wouldn't you...and no longer cognitively deficient.

    What a paradoxic dilemma for you...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous12:09 AM

    Blaber, Dibella is backing a winner. You are backing a nobody who nobody knows.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous1:34 AM

    DiBella is backing a winner..hahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhaahhahahaha. Bradley is a loser and won't be elected to anything.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous6:14 AM

    THANK YOU 11:00 pm, It is never unusual for neocons to baffle us with their bullshit.

    Just like intelligent design,, another mental turd in Disney wrapping paper......

    And Thank you wizards for your 2 billion dollar a day war, not to mention the human lives, but I suppose to you that's a mere emotional issue for the families involved and none of your concern...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous10:17 AM

    11:00, for ARGUMENT's sake, let's say you are right. But then why do you taunt these 'mentally handicapped' conservatives? Would you taunt and EXCLUDE a person with Downs Syndrome? Make it every citizens responsibility to keep them from attaining jobs of influence? IF a downs person were running for an office in your district, would you have the gall to rally against this person soley on the fact that this person is mentally challenged? That is cold.

    Funny how liberals are inclusive with ONLY people who they agree with and exclusive of those they don't, when inclusion is a major part of your ideals. I guess that is where the 2+2=4 or 5 or 6 comes into play. It must be nice to have all that wiggle room, so you can be right all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous12:00 PM

    To 10:17 AM Thanks but no thanks,obviously being a conservative you know only too too well that 2+2 has to equal 5 or 6. That's how your whole free enterprise system works. You guys are the ones who invented twisted math. Have you ever bought a car, a house, or a pack of gum. Then you know that 2+2 has to equal at least 5 or the game can't go on. For most of the Greedmongers it has to equal 7, 8, or 9, to be really worth playing.

    So why would the rest of want or be restricted to real math.

    It was one of your own conservative drones who said, "It's a fool who plays by the golden rule, when the others don't play fair"......

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous10:55 PM

    10:17 am - I never mentioned anyone being "mentally handicapped." That was a comment in an earlier post.

    I said that that you as a conservative are "cognitively deficient." Cognition refers to a state of "knowing" and not an ability to learn.

    People with Downs Syndrome have the ability to learn, while conservatives choose to revel in their ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous11:08 PM

    10:17 am - By the way...I think it's pretty slimy of you to try to make your point by citing people with Downs, and trying to make it look like I was the one who brought them up.

    More typically conservative traits...obfuscation and putting words in your opponents mouth that were never there to begin with...Karl Rove would be proud of you...

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous8:12 AM

    Some good trolling here,downs syndrome doesn't preclude the victim from learning necessarily.The dead spot on conservative's brains does in fact impede their thought.This is a clinical study not theoretical.An MRI can be used to determine whether a person is too afflicted with deformity to have any position of responsibility.We don't let drunk people drive or operate machinery do we?So why do we let the nuts (conservatives)all run free?Btw I don't see any mathematical ability in conservatives to speak of,more like a fundamentally flawed logic that processes math very slowly.Their work is riddled with errors.Worthless in economics.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous8:20 AM

    Nature vs. nurture is heavily in play here,there is no evidence yet that this area of the brain is damaged after birth or genetically stunted.So the phenomenon of genius children coming from conservative parents should lend itself to nurture.If you want your kids to be smart,keep them away from religious indoctrination.That defect(neurological pathway between amygdala and temporal lobes shorted out)should not be cultivated especially in conjunction with this dead spot.Your kids may become religious leaders.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous9:15 AM

    Open your eyes jackass, LOOK AT THE VERY FIRST POST. Here, I will quote it for you:

    "...It uses brain imaging technology to illustrate the mental handicap of the conservative mind..."

    The same has been written in other topics here. So by using Downs, I was illustrating the poor judgement of those who slap down conservatives BECAUSE they are mentally handicapped.

    SO, don't get upset with me for making a parallel, scold those who call conservatism a mental retardation. Now THAT is making light of true disabilities.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous4:38 PM

    hmmmm...you call me a jackass...then say the exact same thing I said...that someone mentioned it in a previous post.

    Again I point out the conservative penchant for revelling in their own ignorance...

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous8:12 AM

    Mental retardation or atrophy of the brain or area of disfunction,it makes no difference what it's called when you're not a victim.Since our country is being destroyed by these "victims" I have no problem calling a spade a spade.If you are a conservative,then you have a mental handicap,period.If you want acceptance in society,then don't get involved with politics.Not too many people believe in a representative style of governance that justifies putting retards in politics to reflect our retarded citizens.The bar for intellectual proficiency is rising and the conservatives will soon all be re-classified as "special."Just like bush.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous10:04 PM

    I work at the polls on election day and I can tell you this time I am not looking foward the da primary. Counting write-in votes is rather a pain. And, Ithink the write in for bradley is going to be huge. I don't say this as a supporter at all. In fact, I amd torn between carnwright and sennet. But bradley has the name and the money. This primary will no doubt show that.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous10:06 PM

    I don't like dibella as far as I can throw her. However, she has the right to back any candidate that she wants.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous10:08 PM

    Not as a Democratic Comitteeman, DiBella can't work against the party's candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous9:51 PM

    Mental Retardation here in (The People's Socialist Republic of) NY is determined by intelligence quotient, period. The standard is a full scale iq of 70 or less. So, now people here are claiming to know the full scale iq of every conservative? Oh and, while this does not go for EVERYONE with ds, the overwhelming statistical majority are also classified as mr in NYS. Ask any one of the social service providers that service and/or house the mentally impaired in the area - Devereux, Anderson, Children's Home, Astor, et cetera.

    Remember, people! Generalization is different from hyperbole!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous7:08 AM

    70 is just too low a number these days.If we raised the standard to 90,we'd have a lot less conservatives spouting their idiotic rhetoric.The standard for genius is now 150,something that had to be raised because the average videogame playing third grader had achieved 140 already.Because of this intelligence gap,only 4% of this generation's school children will become religious fanatics.With this in mind,it our duty as parents to weed out conservatives from society so that our next generation isn't ruled by ignorance and violence.And scientific studies are not generalizations,they're proven facts that condemn conservatives,as well as religious victims.There is no denial other than that of reality.Dead spots on your brain are responsible for conservative thinking,just like the damage that causes religion.The viewpoints of these mentally deficient are no longer valid in our society.They need special protections from the world and we need to protect the world from them.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are published at my discretion. Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them and do not necessarily reflect the views of this blog. Comments are intended to be a means of reaction to a specific post and will be moderated for relevance, obscenity, libel or hateful and defamatory language. Do not submit commercial, off-topic or other copyrighted material.