Tuesday, October 09, 2007

Here and There


Bruce Tuchman who's a nice guy but very misguided in his support for Bradley, wrote a very interesting comment on the Freeman website in response to an article the Freeman did on the D.A. candidates the other day. In the article Tuchman tries to justify why Conservative candidate Vincent Bradley is still in the race for D.A., I think Mr. Tuchman should learn that some things are just not justifiable. In his letter he claims that Bradley was not treated like a Democrat. Are you kidding me? The guy was invited into the process and lost fair and square to Democrat Jonathan Sennett not once but twice! Mr. Tuchman also states that the Dem's should unite behind Vince Bradley or we'll have a GOP D.A. At this point we must wonder if Tuchman, who owns the very popular Uptown Cigar Shop , is putting some of that funny tobacco in his cigars. Is this not the same Tuchman who thought we should unite behind Andrew Cuomo for Governor? Andrew Cuomo was smart enough to drop out before the primary and went on to bigger and better things. Mr. Tuchman's friend should learn the same lesson.


Tonight, I was making some voter identification calls, and I got a very positive response on the Democratic candidates for November. A lot of people, however, are undecided or don't know who the candidates are.... one such call that was humorous and sad at the same time...It was a call for Kingston Mayor... when I asked her who she was voting for in the Mayoral election without skipping a beat she responded Mayor T.R. Gallo. Now, I didn't have the heart to tell this woman that our beloved mayor has been dead for over 5 years but I think she'll figure out somethings up come November 6th. While we all wish T.R. was still in charge and running Kingston, he's not, it's simply amazing how anyone can be so misinformed and disconnected about their local community.

27 comments:

Anonymous said...

McCain said he wanted Alan Greenspan dead to prop him up with sunglasses,to promote a flat tax. Dead people are popular with "flat earthers" because they can't speak for themselves. A flat tax would annihilate the middle class. It's too bad Hinchey's career is about to go down in flames for being involved with Bradley. Cigars btw are just substitutes for sucking on a black man's genitalia. Tuchman's a fruitcake too.

Anonymous said...

Jeremy said--
"In his (Tuchman)letter he claims that Bradley was not treated like a Democrat. Are you kidding me? "

Jeremy, did you not follow the same Chain of events that I did????

Sennett won the endorsement of the party leadership. He did not win the exclusive right to be the party's candidate in November. That same party leadership denied Bradley a primary election on the sole basis that he was not a democrat. Now you imply that he was treated as a democrat. Did you sleep through all of these events???

Get a life!

Anonymous said...

Tuchman is a dope. Bradley is a baby.

The DA's job is to enforce rules. Bradley can't even follow rules of joining a party. Some investigstor he is not knowing to register before leaving NYC. He claims to always have lived here. Hog wash Sherlock Holmes.

If the rules don't apply to you...how can you hold a job where you must enforce the rules?

Hard feelings......might have a place at a 7th grade dance, but not in a race for DA.

Bradley has insulted the committee people by saying in the paper that they didn't know what was good for them...not once but twice.

What would the politically savvy Morganthau say about his former ADA now? He'd say save your career, man. Get out before you are run over by the train coming down the tracks.

Bradley, Beesmer and Tuchman are sore losers.

To argue that Bradley was not given a fair chance by a party he was trying to invade would not even qualify for an insanity defense. His campaign is a fraud he is a weak candidate.

Let's back a campaign that will beat the republican and hold the thiefs who stole money from taxpayers in the jail mess accountable.

Anonymous said...

Bradley always lived in Kingston?

Man that must have been a brutal commute to Manhattan every day.

Anonymous said...

I'd vote for him! Let's get Shayne in!

Anonymous said...

I can't help but wonder if the woman Jeremy spoke to on the phone knew EXACTLY who was running...

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I did that commute for six months and it was hell.I put sixty thousand miles on a brand new vehicle and broke the windshield five times. I hardly think that schlub was doing that.

Anonymous said...

To 9:39 - Let's simplify the situation.

#1. The County Committee didn't deny Bradley of anything.

#2. Bradley denied himself the right to a Democratic primary by not being a member of the party.

#3. It's like this: you can't shop at Sam's Club unless you are a member, you can't drive without a license, you can't earn skymiles unless you join the skyclub.

#4. Bradley could have enrolled as a Democrat ANYTIME. He could have joined when he was 18, 25, 35, or even on December 31, 2006.

#5. But he didn't, and thus he put himself in an awkward position.

#6. So he requested a special exemption asking that the Party overlook his own stupidity for not being a member of the Party.

#7. The Party didn't think he was that special, so they didn't give him the special exemption. Three times over.

#8. Now, not only is Bradley NOT special, but he is stupid. Big, balding and stupid.

#9. And you expect us to support a fool who is so stupid that he can't file papers on time? You think he should be allowed to reap the benefits of Party membership when he chose not become a member?

#10. Right. You must be stupid!

Anonymous said...

Bradley is NOT a conservative - plain and simple!

If he was a true conservative he would not believe that it is a woman's right to choose.

That belief is not party of The Conservative Party platform.

Anonymous said...

who cares about party endorsement, VINCET BRADLEY is the right choice to be D.A.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Between the "vincet" and the ridiculous number of exclamation points,that poster sums up why no one was impressed by Vinnie the weasel. Those are the kind of endorsements I like. "Vote for Bradley because all the retards are!" Classic!

Anonymous said...

Is it me or is there a common catholic bond of these Bradley supporters. Could it be that Sennett's child victim division is a threat to pedophile priests? If the catholic church is interfering I could seek to revoke their 529 status. Any insight?

ralph childers said...

Hey, None of the prior comments on this thread were from me! However, many were fun to read. In fact I laughed out loud at some. It is good to be able to laugh in the midst of such insanity. May the best man win. Do I have to name him? Jon Sennett folks. Jon Sennett, a very qualified man who decided to seek the office before the current DA announced his retirement.

Anonymous said...

That last comment sounds like it came from that moron jeff kelly. Get a life you loser! What is your hang up with the catholic church? Get some professional help!

Anonymous said...

Bradley supporters are just misguided, and want to vote their Kingston guy in despite his being completely unqualified.

Leave the Catholic Church out of it.

Anonymous said...

I see the godheads and their pedophilic propensities are above reproach. Too bad that idiot Burke attacked Rudy already and made them fair game. So I ask, have there been cover-ups in UC with sexual abuses in Catholic churches? I haven't heard of any. Does that mean they're still coming? We know it's a universal problem with them. Were they settled here or just delayed? I find it hard to believe that this idiocy is not something really big. I don't think it's credible that Kingston residents are all stupid. Something is motivating this and every avenue will be investigated. So put aside your defense of religion for a second and think. Could political corruption be that big and escape the scrutiny of the authorities? Is there any sane reason for Bradley to have nine times the cash of the democratic nominee without any cover-up? Usually fools and their money are parted and can't fund political hacks. I don't think these are fools. I think we're going to find out and the suspense is killing me.

Anonymous said...

Liberalism and the sexual revolution of the 60s has done in the Catholic Church. For Centuries prior, Priests would cull young homosexuals into the Priesthood, through admissions of "impure" thoughts in Confession. The celebecy vows were enough to supress the homosexual tendencies, until along comes the sexual revolution, equality, gay pride parades, etc.. and low and behold, you have rampant pedophelia in the Catholic Church. While not all gays are pedophiles, those Priests are. As far as I know, the only alleged pedophile Priest in our area was at the Presentation Church in Port Ewen back during the 70s. In typical cover-up fashion, the Church transferred the sicko Priest to a Mission in the Carribean. Out of sight, out of mind. The cover-ups are coming back to kick the Church in the but. It's a shame, as the message of the Catholic Church is a good one. We, like the Church, do not practice what we preach. It's the downfall of the Catholic Church, and will be the eventual downfall of America.

ExCommunicated Kingstonian

Anonymous said...

So there's a definite fear of prosecution,leading to litigation which justifies(immorally)interference by the cult. Thanks,I knew it was a factor.

Anonymous said...

This woman who is voting for T.R., who is she going to vote for president? Lyndon Johnson? You want the definition of the uninformed voter, that's it right there. And, the democrats are lucky to have many of them on their side. Something to be 'proud' of.

Anonymous said...

Like I said...I think she knows EXACTLY who's running...

Anonymous said...

Frank Koening for Mayor!!!

Anonymous said...

Blabber said: "it's simply amazing how anyone can be so misinformed and disconnected about their local community."

the irony just kills me Jeremy - really.

and the fact that you have not deleted the first comment in this thread - which is BLATANTLY racist - speaks volumes about you.

Anonymous said...

True dems should boycot Hoffman House.

Anonymous said...

True dems should boycot Hoffman House.

Anonymous said...

I loved the Hoffman House, but I won't patronize it anymore. Why would they support such an idiot?

Anonymous said...

You people are complete IDIOTS for refusing to patronize a business that supports a particular candidate.

True, Bradley is a bad choice for DA.
Sennett is the best choice. But, try and remember the collateral damage boycotting the restaurant causes. People who work there have nothing to do with the campaign, and should not suffer therefore.
Rents, food, heating the house all depend on continued patronage.

I urge Jon to come out and denounce people here who are calling for a boycott to the Hoffman House.

Sennett supporters must rise above the fray and not sink to Bradleyesque tactics.

We're winning, folks. No need to behave like that.

DEMonopoly